"The sad thing is that even if Santa Claus suddenly made their hardware real for free, the first thing you'd want to do is cancel it," Musk wrote in a tweet. ![]() Musk, in response to Blue Origin's infographic, gave his view of Bezos' company and its criticism. In a series of comparative infographics, Blue Origin has emphasized the "unprecedented number of technologies, developments, and operations that have never been done before for Starship to land on the Moon."īlue Origin last week released an infographic that added that Starship is "a launch vehicle that has never flown to orbit and is still being designed." ![]() The company's court filing on Monday comes as Blue Origin has stepped up a public relations offensive against NASA using SpaceX's next-generation Starship to land astronauts on the moon. Before the April contract award, NASA had handed out nearly $1 billion in concept development contracts – with SpaceX receiving $135 million, Dynetics $253 million, and Blue Origin receiving $579 million. Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lowerīlue Origin has not let up on its fight to win a contract under NASA's HLS program, one of the final key pieces of the agency's plan to return U.S. Jeff Bezos' space company filed the lawsuit against NASA in August, claiming the space agency's decision to award a 2.9 billion contract to SpaceX was 'unfair' and demonstrated favoritism towards. Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower NASA will resume work with SpaceX under the Option A contract as soon as possible,” the agency said in a statement.Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit Court of Federal Claims denied Blue Origin’s bid protest, upholding NASA’s selection of SpaceX to develop and demonstrate a modern human lunar lander. “NASA was notified Thursday that the U.S. With the Blue Origin lawsuit thrown out, NASA appears to be moving forward with its SpaceX contract. NASA’s announcement provided that the number of awards the agency would make was subject to the amount of funding available for the program.” SpaceX’s bid was the highest rated and came in at $2.9 billion, far less than either Blue Origin or Dynetics.īlue Origin said in its lawsuit that if it had known that NASA was going to ignore FRRs and make cost a priority, the company “would have proposed a fundamentally different HLS design,” and it “would have engineered and proposed an entirely different architecture with corresponding differences in technical management and price scores.” Advertisementįurther Reading Here’s why Blue Origin thinks it is justified in continuing to protest NASAThe GAO dismissed both arguments, saying that “NASA did not violate procurement law or regulation when it decided to make only one award. ![]() Blue Origin said that NASA’s request for bids called for an FRR for every launch and that SpaceX’s bid only covered one of more than a dozen launches. Such meetings allow NASA officials to be briefed on what will happen during a mission, giving them an important opportunity for oversight of public-private partnerships. Jeff Bezos was more conciliatory, saying in a tweet, "Not the decision we wanted, but we respect the court’s judgment, and wish full success for NASA and SpaceX on the contract."īlue Origin claimed that, in granting the award to SpaceX, NASA ignored a requirement that bidders submit a flight readiness review (FRR) for each part of the landing systems. “Returning astronauts safely to the Moon through NASA’s public-private partnership model requires an unprejudiced procurement process alongside sound policy that incorporates redundant systems and promotes competition.” Further Reading This is probably why Blue Origin keeps protesting NASA’s lunar lander award“Our lawsuit with the Court of Federal Claims highlighted the important safety issues with the Human Landing System procurement process that must still be addressed,” Blue Origin said in a statement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |